How Cyclones Increase Forest Fire Risk
- In 2024, global forest disturbance from fire reached its highest level since monitoring began in 2001, with tropical forests absorbing more than a quarter of all fire-related destruction worldwide, according to research published in PNAS in 2025.
- A critical but underappreciated driver of this surge is the compound disaster pathway in which land in a cyclone’s wake becomes more vulnerable to forest fires.
- When a cyclone strikes a forest, it deposits massive quantities of broken timber, uprooted root systems, torn branches, and dead leaf litter across the forest floor, creating a combustible stockpile that takes months or years to dry out.
The connection between cyclones and wildfire is one of the most consequential yet underexplored relationships in modern disaster ecology. Land in a cyclone’s wake becomes more vulnerable to forest fires not through a single mechanism but through a cascade of physical and biological changes that transform a formerly fire-resistant landscape into a high-risk combustion zone.
A forest that survived centuries of seasonal drought can become dangerously flammable within one to two years of a major cyclone strike, simply because the storm deposited enormous quantities of dead organic matter that the ecosystem cannot rapidly process. As the global area of forest disturbance from fire in 2023 and 2024 was found to be 2.2 times higher than the 2002–2022 annual average (PNAS, 2025), the urgency of understanding compound storm-fire sequences has never been greater.
How Cyclones Transform Forest Ecosystems
A cyclone arriving over a forested landscape does not simply bend trees. It restructures the entire physical architecture of the ecosystem in a matter of hours. The combination of sustained gale-force winds and intense rainfall creates a mechanical assault that few mature trees can fully survive.
Robert Scheller, a professor of forestry and environmental resources at NC State University, describes the immediate outcome clearly: the strong winds and heavy rain can topple trees, leaving behind needles, leaves, and branches that act as fuels for wildfires (NC State University, 2024).
1. Wind Damage, Uprooting, and Structural Collapse
Wind-related tree failure occurs in two primary modes. The first is stem breakage, where wind stress exceeds the tensile strength of the trunk at its weakest point, typically partway up the bole.
The second is uprooting, where lateral wind pressure overcomes the anchoring capacity of the root plate, pulling the entire tree from the ground and leaving a crater-sized pit in the soil. Both failure types deposit massive volumes of woody biomass on the forest floor almost instantly.
Research published in ScienceDirect noted that wind disturbance affects a combined 1.65 million hectares of forest in the United States alone each year, and that hurricanes in particular increase both the probability and the extent of wildfire primarily through large-scale surface fuel load increases (ScienceDirect, 2014).
2. Changes to Canopy Structure and Forest Microclimate
Beyond individual tree failures, cyclones fundamentally alter the forest canopy, which is the upper layer of leaf cover and branches that regulates light, humidity, and wind speed within the forest interior.
An intact canopy keeps the forest floor shaded, moist, and relatively calm. When cyclone winds remove or shred that canopy, the forest floor is suddenly exposed to direct sunlight, elevated air temperatures, and drying winds.
This shift in microclimate from cool and moist to warm, dry, and exposed accelerates the desiccation of the debris the storm deposited, pushing the landscape closer to the conditions required for fire ignition.
Rodriguez-Trejo et al. (2011, AGROCIENCIA) studied forests in Mexico’s Quintana Roo, Campeche, and Yucatan states after Hurricane Dean and found that the modal fuel load in affected areas was 40–60 Mg per hectare, with a maximum of 137 Mg per hectare, and that approximately 992,000 hectares reached very high to extreme fire hazard classification.
A single major cyclone can convert nearly one million hectares of forest into extreme fire-risk terrain within a season, requiring immediate post-storm fuel assessment and management planning.
Creation of Large Amounts of Fire Fuel
Fuel load is the term used by fire ecologists to describe the total mass of combustible organic material available per unit area of land, typically measured in metric tons per hectare. It is the single most consistent determinant of fire intensity; research confirms that fire parameters such as radiative energy density increase directly with fuel consumption. Cyclones drive fuel loads to extraordinary levels not just by depositing debris, but by doing so uniformly across vast landscape patches.
1. Fallen Trees, Branches, and Dead Vegetation Accumulation
The categories of storm-generated fuel are multiple and compound each other over time. Large fallen trunks provide the slow-burning heavy fuel that sustains a fire long after lighter debris has been consumed.
Broken branches and smaller limbs form the medium fuel fraction that allows a fire to spread horizontally. Detached needles, leaves, and bark fragments create the fine fuel layer at the soil surface, which is the fraction most sensitive to atmospheric drying and the category most responsible for rapid ignition and initial fire spread.
1. Pine needles are particularly hazardous in the post-storm environment because they contain high concentrations of flammable resins and are coated in a waxy layer that slows decomposition. This means pine needle debris can remain dry and highly flammable for one to two years after deposition, sustaining fire risk long after the storm itself is forgotten (NC State University, 2024).
2. Uprooted trees expose mineral soil and underground organic matter to air, which accelerates oxidation and produces additional dry organic debris at the soil surface level, compounding the fine fuel accumulation from above-ground storm damage.
3. Herbaceous vegetation and shrubs that die back after storm disturbance add a layer of grass-like fine fuels that dry rapidly and act as a flame conduit between patches of heavier woody debris, enabling fire to traverse gaps that would otherwise interrupt spread.
2. Quantifying Fuel Load Increases After Major Cyclones
The scale of fuel accumulation following major cyclones is striking in documented case studies. In 2018, Hurricane Michael destroyed 72 million tons of standing timber across the Florida Panhandle, including approximately 1.3 million acres of longleaf pine habitat.
Just two years later, the Bertha Swamp Road Fire consumed more than 33,000 acres of that same timberland, burning directly through the fuel stockpile that Michael had created (NC State University, 2024). This case exemplifies precisely the mechanism by which land in a cyclone’s wake becomes more vulnerable to forest fires: the storm plants the seeds of the next disaster.
Post-Cyclone Drying Processes: From Waterlogged to Combustible
One of the counterintuitive aspects of the cyclone-fire relationship is that cyclones arrive with extraordinary rainfall, flooding the forest floor and saturating every piece of organic material.
Observers might logically assume that a storm-soaked landscape is safe from fire for years afterward. This assumption is wrong. The transition from post-cyclone saturation to post-cyclone extreme flammability follows a predictable drying sequence that fire managers must understand in detail.
1. The Drying Sequence After Storm Conditions
Immediately after a cyclone, the debris field is wet and decomposition microbes begin attacking the organic material. However, the exposed microclimate created by canopy removal accelerates evaporative drying far more rapidly than would occur in an intact forest.
Direct solar radiation heats the debris surface, warm air circulation driven by the now-open canopy removes moisture-laden air from the debris layer, and shallow-rooted storm-killed vegetation no longer transpires water that would otherwise maintain local humidity levels.
Within three to six months in tropical climates, the fine fuel fraction of storm debris reaches critically low moisture content thresholds.
2. Seasonal Drought as the Fire Trigger
Fuel moisture content (FMC) is the key variable controlling whether an ignition source produces a sustained fire. FMC is expressed as the percentage of water mass relative to the dry mass of the fuel material. When FMC in fine fuels drops below approximately 10–15%, ignition from a spark or lightning strike reliably produces sustained fire spread.
In tropical and subtropical regions, the seasonal dry season arriving six to twelve months after a cyclone frequently drives fine fuel FMC below this threshold across the entire debris field simultaneously. The result is a landscape ready to ignite at scale.
Newsweek and the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (2022) reported that rainforests struck by cyclones lose their inherent fire resistance when the damaged vegetation dries out, and that the three prerequisites for fire, namely available fuel, a dry enough microclimate, and an ignition source, can all be simultaneously created or amplified by a single cyclone event.
Forest managers in cyclone-prone tropical regions should begin post-storm fuel monitoring and drying assessments within the first growing season following a major storm, not after visible fire risk is already apparent.
Why Fire Risk Increases After Cyclones
The elevated fire risk that follows a cyclone is not explained by any single factor but by the simultaneous convergence of several independent fire-promoting conditions. Understanding each mechanism separately makes it easier to identify which intervention can break the chain at which point.
1. Greater Availability of Combustible Material
As detailed above, the primary mechanism is the massive amplification of fuel load. An undamaged mature tropical forest typically carries surface fuel loads of roughly 5–15 metric tons per hectare.
A cyclone-damaged forest can accumulate fuel loads exceeding 40–60 metric tons per hectare within one growing season, an increase of three to ten times the baseline. This fuel surplus directly translates into higher fire intensity, longer burn duration, and greater resistance to suppression efforts.
2. Easier Ignition and Faster Fire Spread
Beyond raw fuel quantity, the physical arrangement of storm debris creates conditions highly favorable to ignition and spread. Fallen debris creates a continuous fuel layer connecting what were previously discontinuous patches of flammable material.
This connectivity, termed fuel continuity in fire ecology, means that a fire starting at one point in the landscape encounters far fewer natural firebreaks than it would in an undamaged forest.
Additionally, the removal of forest canopy exposes the debris field to wind, which both increases ignition probability from windblown embers and accelerates the rate of fire spread once combustion is established.
3. Reduced Moisture Retention and Changed Wind Patterns
Intact forest ecosystems retain moisture through multiple mechanisms: leaf interception of rainfall, root water uptake and transpiration, shading of the soil surface, and the buffering of dry winds by the canopy layer.
Storm damage eliminates or reduces all of these mechanisms simultaneously. The damaged landscape becomes effectively a lower-albedo, higher-evaporation surface that dries faster and stays drier than pre-storm conditions.
Combined with the more open wind field that the damaged canopy creates within the forest interior, the post-cyclone landscape exhibits fire spread rates that can be two to three times higher than equivalent undamaged forest under identical atmospheric conditions.
Scientific Evidence Linking Cyclones and Wildfires
The scientific literature on the cyclone-wildfire compound disaster pathway has grown significantly over the past decade, driven by the increasing frequency of observable cyclone-fire sequences in real-world landscapes. Several key findings deserve close attention from land managers and policymakers.
1. Key Research Findings and Historical Examples
Research published by NC State University’s Center for Geospatial Analytics in 2024 synthesized the fire ecology of hurricane-affected pine forests and confirmed that hurricane-force winds can kill large numbers of trees particularly close to landfall zones, creating fuel load conditions that directly drive subsequent wildfire behavior.
The study also identified the slower decomposition rate of pine needle debris as a critical factor extending fire risk windows beyond what would be expected from leaf litter of deciduous species.
Separately, a paleoecological analysis confirmed the cyclone-fire hypothesis at geological timescales, finding that forest disturbance by wind followed by subsequent burning is a recurring pattern in sediment records from hurricane-prone forest biomes.
2. Case Studies from Affected Regions
The Florida Panhandle sequence of Hurricane Michael in 2018 and the Bertha Swamp Road Fire in 2020 is the most documented case in the peer-reviewed and institutional literature.
A parallel sequence occurred in Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula region after Hurricane Dean in 2007, where the Rodriguez-Trejo et al. study found fuel loads reaching extreme levels across nearly one million hectares.
Similar cyclone-fire sequences have been documented in the Pacific Island forests of New Caledonia and Vanuatu, where Thomas Ibanez of the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development has documented the cyclone-fire feedback loop as a recurring feature of island forest ecology (Newsweek, 2022).
Research published in PNAS (2025) found that global forest disturbance from fire in 2023 and 2024 was 2.2 times higher than the 2002–2022 annual average, and 3 times higher in tropical forests specifically, with more than one quarter of all 2024 fire disturbance occurring in tropical forests.
The convergence of intensifying cyclone activity and accelerating tropical fire disturbance means that compound cyclone-fire events will become an increasingly dominant driver of tropical forest loss in the coming decades unless proactive management systems are established.
Regions Most Vulnerable to Post-Cyclone Fires: A Geographic Profile
The intersection of high cyclone activity and seasonally dry climate conditions defines the geographic zones most exposed to post-storm fire risk. These regions require the most urgent attention from forest managers and climate adaptation planners.
Tropical and subtropical forest belts straddling both sides of the equator, particularly those in the western Pacific basin, the Bay of Bengal rim, and the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean arc, face the highest compound exposure.
These are regions where tropical cyclone return intervals are short enough to maintain chronically elevated fuel loads, and where seasonal dry seasons follow the cyclone-active months closely enough to drive post-storm debris to critical fire moisture thresholds every year.
1. Coastal forest ecosystems face compounded vulnerability because they sit at the point of maximum cyclone intensity at landfall, receive the highest wind damage loads, and are often bordered by agricultural or urban landscapes that provide ignition sources during post-storm dry periods.
2. Island forest environments, including the Pacific island forests of Fiji, New Caledonia, Vanuatu, and the Caribbean island forests of Puerto Rico and Hispaniola, are particularly exposed because their small land areas mean that a single cyclone can affect the majority of the island’s forested terrain in one event, leaving no undamaged forest reservoir to provide seed sources or moisture buffering for the damaged zones.
3. Regions experiencing both cyclones and La Nina or El Nino driven seasonal droughts face the most acute fire windows, because the same climate oscillations that suppress cyclone activity in some years intensify post-storm drying in others, creating a temporal concentration of both storm damage and fire risk within the same multi-year climate cycle.
Ecological Effects of Post-Cyclone Fire
When fire moves through a cyclone-damaged forest, it does not simply burn debris. It consumes the seed banks, the soil organic horizon, the surviving understory vegetation, and the root networks of storm-damaged trees that might otherwise have regenerated naturally. The ecological consequences of this compound disturbance are substantially more severe than either event alone.
1. Loss of Biodiversity and Habitat
Intact forest landscapes hold 2.7 times higher aboveground biomass than degraded forest landscapes and carry disproportionately high biodiversity values (PNAS, 2025). When post-cyclone fire burns through these landscapes, it eliminates habitat for species that require
- structural complexity,
- vertical forest layering, and
- large-diameter old-growth trees.
Many specialist species, particularly those with limited dispersal capacity such as flightless insects, amphibians, and slow-moving reptiles, are unable to escape the fire front or recolonize rapidly afterward.
2. Long-Term Ecosystem Recovery Challenges
The recovery trajectory of a compound cyclone-fire affected forest is fundamentally different from that of a forest affected by either disturbance alone. Cyclone damage alone typically triggers vigorous vegetative regrowth from surviving root systems and retained seed banks.
A forest does not remember a cyclone after it regenerates. But when fire follows the cyclone, it forgets how to regenerate at all.
Fire added on top of cyclone damage destroys the root systems of storm-damaged trees that were beginning to resprout and kills or consumes the seed bank that would have supported natural regeneration. The result is a landscape with degraded soil structure, reduced organic matter, elevated erosion risk, and a dramatically altered species composition in the regenerating forest.
Impacts on Communities and Infrastructure
The elevated wildfire risk created by a cyclone-damaged landscape does not remain a purely ecological concern. Communities and infrastructure located near or within storm-affected forest zones face dramatically elevated threats in the months and years following a major storm.
1. Wildfire Threats to Settlements and Economic Losses
The proximity of storm debris fields to settled areas means that post-cyclone wildfires often approach community boundaries far more rapidly than fires in undamaged forest, because the higher fuel loads produce faster rates of spread and the canopy removal allows wind-driven ember transport over longer distances.
Economic losses compound in these scenarios: communities that suffered crop, infrastructure, or property damage from the cyclone then face the additional cost and risk of wildfire response, evacuation, and rebuilt infrastructure destruction.
2. Public Health Consequences from Post-Cyclone Fire Smoke
Post-cyclone wildfires burning through high fuel load debris produce smoke with particularly high particulate concentrations, because the volume of combusting material exceeds the quantity typically consumed in undamaged forest fires.
Particulate matter (PM2.5), the fine smoke particles measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, penetrates deeply into lung tissue and is associated with increased rates of
- respiratory disease,
- cardiovascular events, and
- premature mortality.
Communities that experience post-cyclone wildfire smoke while simultaneously dealing with storm-damaged healthcare infrastructure face compounded public health emergencies with limited capacity to respond.
Climate Change and Compound Disaster Risks
Climate change acts simultaneously on both ends of the cyclone-fire pathway, intensifying cyclone destructive power on one end and lengthening and deepening fire-promoting drought conditions on the other. The result is a compound risk environment that is growing more dangerous with each decade of continued warming.
1. Stronger Cyclones and Longer Fire Seasons
Tropical cyclones draw energy from warm ocean surface temperatures. As global ocean temperatures rise, the thermodynamic energy available to cyclones at peak intensity increases, producing storms capable of depositing larger fuel loads across wider forest areas.
Simultaneously, climate change is extending fire seasons by shifting the timing and duration of seasonal droughts, reducing the recovery time available between a cyclone’s debris deposition and the arrival of fire-promoting atmospheric conditions.
In 2024, fires were responsible for nearly 48% of all tree cover loss in tropical primary forests, the first year that fires surpassed agriculture as the leading cause of forest loss in these regions.
2. Future Projections for Cyclone-Fire Relationships
Climate models consistently project increasing frequency of high-intensity precipitation events coinciding with more intense tropical cyclone activity, meaning that the cyclone-side of the compound disaster equation will grow.
On the fire side, PNAS (2025) confirms that climate models predict continued increases in both frequency and intensity of fire weather globally. The convergence of these two trends in the same geographic zones means that the cyclone-fire compound disaster pathway is projected to become a dominant driver of tropical and subtropical forest loss by mid-century without significant intervention in forest management and climate emissions trajectories.
The World Resources Institute (2026) reported that despite a 36% drop in tropical rainforest loss in 2025, total tropical primary forest loss remains 46% higher than a decade ago, and that climate-driven fires represent a dangerous new normal threatening to reverse recent conservation gains.
Even in years with reduced direct deforestation, the compound fire pathway sustained by cyclone damage and climate-driven drought can rapidly undo years of conservation investment unless cyclone debris management is integrated into national forest resilience strategies.
Monitoring the Landscape After the Storm
Effective management of post-cyclone fire risk requires accurate, timely information about where fuel loads are highest, how quickly vegetation is drying, and which areas carry the greatest ignition risk. Modern monitoring technology has transformed this assessment capability over the past decade.
1. Satellite Monitoring of Storm-Damaged Forests
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite instruments can penetrate cloud cover to map storm-damaged forest areas within days of cyclone landfall, producing detailed canopy damage maps that identify zones of high debris accumulation.
Optical satellite platforms, including those used by the USDA’s Forest Service and the Global Forest Watch system, can track temporal changes in surface reflectance that correspond to drying of storm debris over subsequent months, providing an approximate proxy for fuel moisture trajectory across large landscapes at relatively low cost.
2. Fuel Load Mapping and Early Warning Systems
Fuel-load mapping protocols combine satellite-derived damage estimates with ground-truth sampling in representative debris patches to generate spatial estimates of post-storm fuel load distribution.
The U.S. National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) integrates meteorological observations, estimated fuel moisture of various size classes, and surface fuel loading with site characteristics to derive fire danger indices that directly reflect rate of spread and energy release potential.
Applying this framework in post-cyclone landscapes, with fuel load inputs derived from storm damage mapping rather than baseline forest inventory data, provides an early warning tool specifically calibrated to the elevated risk conditions of storm-affected terrain.
Forest Management and Mitigation Strategies
The cyclone-to-fire pathway is not inevitable. Targeted management interventions can substantially reduce post-storm fire risk if implemented within the window of opportunity that exists between storm impact and the arrival of the dry season.
1. Debris Removal, Fuel Reduction, and Controlled Burns
Mechanical fuel reduction, including salvage logging of fallen timber, chipping of branches and fine debris, and prescribed burning of residual litter, can reduce post-cyclone fuel loads from extreme levels back toward the manageable range.
The timing of these interventions is critical. Debris must be processed while it still retains some moisture content to prevent premature ignition during operations, but must be addressed before seasonal drying drives FMC to critical thresholds.
A systematic, prioritized approach that targets the highest-fuel-load patches adjacent to communities and critical infrastructure first maximizes risk reduction per unit of management effort.
- Conduct satellite-based damage mapping within 30 days of cyclone impact to identify the highest-priority fuel accumulation zones across the affected landscape.
- Deploy ground survey teams to validate satellite damage estimates in representative sample areas and collect fuel load measurements to calibrate spatial models.
- Prioritize mechanical debris removal in zones within 500 to 1,000 meters of settlements, infrastructure corridors, and ecologically sensitive areas where post-storm fire would produce the greatest human and biodiversity harm.
- Apply prescribed burning in lower-priority zones where mechanical removal is not feasible, using the post-storm debris itself as the fuel source in a controlled, managed burn conducted under favorable atmospheric conditions before the dry season peak.
- Monitor fuel moisture content in residual debris using weather station networks and remote sensing proxies throughout the dry season following the storm, triggering escalating public fire danger warnings as FMC approaches the critical 10–15% threshold.
- Restore damaged forest canopy through targeted replanting in the most severely impacted zones to begin reestablishing the microclimate buffering that reduces fire risk over the medium and long term.
2. Community Preparedness and Restoration
One of the most significant barriers to post-cyclone fire risk reduction is jurisdictional. Robert Scheller of NC State University notes that much of the destruction after a hurricane happens on private property, and government agencies require permission before clearing debris on land they do not own.
The window between a cyclone’s departure and the dry season’s arrival is not a recovery period. It is a preparation period, and every day lost to inaction narrows the margin between a manageable debris field and an uncontrollable wildfire.
Community preparedness programs that establish pre-agreed permission frameworks, educate landowners about post-cyclone fire risk, and provide technical and financial support for private land debris clearance are therefore as important as any technical management method.
Restoration programs that accelerate natural regeneration through direct seeding and planted nursery stock can additionally shorten the high-risk window by reestablishing a partial canopy that reduces surface fuel drying rates.
Future Research What Science Still Needs to Solve
Despite significant advances in understanding the cyclone-fire compound disaster pathway, important research gaps remain. Closing these gaps will be essential to improving the predictive and management tools available to forest managers and disaster planners.
1. Improving Predictive Models and Ecosystem Resilience
Current fire behavior models were largely developed and calibrated for undamaged forest landscapes. Their performance degrades when applied to the complex, heterogeneous fuel structures created by cyclone damage.
Research that characterizes post-cyclone fuel distribution, vertical fuel arrangement, and drying rate dynamics at sufficient spatial resolution to drive improved fire spread models is a high-priority need.
Equally important is research on ecosystem resilience, specifically on the conditions under which a compound-affected forest successfully returns to pre-disturbance composition and structure versus the conditions under which the combined disturbance triggers a permanent state shift toward lower-biomass, fire-prone vegetation types.
2. Integrating Cyclone and Wildfire Management Frameworks
Currently, cyclone disaster response and wildfire management operate as largely separate institutional systems, with separate response agencies, separate monitoring tools, and separate risk assessment frameworks.
A major research and institutional design priority is the development of integrated compound disaster protocols that seamlessly hand off from cyclone damage assessment to post-storm fire risk monitoring within a single operational framework.
This integration requires not only technical model development but also institutional coordination mechanisms and policy frameworks that authorize rapid cross-agency response without the jurisdictional delays that have historically limited post-storm debris management effectiveness.
Conclusion
Every major cyclone that makes landfall over forested terrain plants the seeds of the next disaster. Land in a cyclone’s wake becomes more vulnerable to forest fires through a chain of mechanisms so reliable that it can be anticipated and, with sufficient preparation, substantially mitigated.
The physical transformation of forest structure, the accumulation of extraordinary fuel loads, the accelerated post-storm drying driven by canopy removal, and the convergence of these conditions with seasonal drought create a compound fire risk that can persist for one to three years after a storm has passed from public attention.
As PNAS confirmed in 2025, global forest fire disturbance is at its highest recorded level, and tropical forests bear a disproportionate share of that burden. Climate change is making both components of the compound pathway more dangerous, producing stronger cyclones and longer fire seasons within the same geographic corridors.
References:
1. Ibanez, T., Platt, W. J., Bellingham, P. J., Vieilledent, G., Franklin, J., Martin, P. H., … & Keppel, G. (2022). Altered cyclone–fire interactions are changing ecosystems. Trends in Plant Science, 27(12), 1218-1230.
2. Swann, D. E., Bellingham, P. J., & Martin, P. H. (2024). Cyclone–fire interactions enhance fire extent and severity in a tropical montane pine forest. Ecosystems, 27(4), 559-576.
3. Lidskog, R., & Sjödin, D. (2016). Extreme events and climate change: the post-disaster dynamics of forest fires and forest storms in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 31(2), 148-155.
4. Schelhaas, M. J., Hengeveld, G., Moriondo, M., Reinds, G. J., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Ter Maat, H., & Bindi, M. (2010). Assessing risk and adaptation options to fires and windstorms in European forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15(7), 681-701.
5. Newman, S. M., Carroll, M. S., Jakes, P. J., Williams, D. R., & Higgins, L. L. (2014). Earth, wind, and fire: Wildfire risk perceptions in a hurricane-prone environment. Society & Natural Resources, 27(11), 1161-1176.
6. Xi, W. (2015). Synergistic effects of tropical cyclones on forest ecosystems: a global synthesis. Journal of Forestry Research, 26(1), 1-21.
7. Hutley, L. B., Evans, B. J., Beringer, J., Cook, G. D., Maier, S. W., & Razon, E. (2013). Impacts of an extreme cyclone event on landscape-scale savanna fire, productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 045023.
8. Myers, R. K., & Van Lear, D. H. (1998). Hurricane-fire interactions in coastal forests of the south: a review and hypothesis. Forest Ecology and Management, 103(2-3), 265-276.
9. Angra, D., & Sapountzaki, K. (2022). Climate change affecting forest fire and flood risk—facts, predictions, and perceptions in Central and South Greece. Sustainability, 14(20), 13395.
10. Turton, S. M. (2013). Tropical cyclones and forest dynamics under a changing climate: what are the long-term implications for tropical forest canopies in the cyclone belt?. In Treetops at risk: Challenges of global canopy ecology and conservation (pp. 105-111). New York, NY: Springer New York.
11. Robinne, F. N., & Secretariat, F. (2021). Impacts of disasters on forests, in particular forest fires. UNFFS Background paper.
12. Turton, S. M. (2012). Securing landscape resilience to tropical cyclones in Australia’s Wet Tropics under a changing climate: Lessons from Cyclones Larry (and Yasi). Geographical Research, 50(1), 15-30.
13. Krikken, F., Lehner, F., Haustein, K., Drobyshev, I., & van Oldenborgh, G. J. (2021). Attribution of the role of climate change in the forest fires in Sweden 2018. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(7), 2169-2179.
