Home Crop ManagementAbiotic StressHeavy Metals Eco friendly nickel infused orange peels effectively remove heavy metals from Waste Water

Eco friendly nickel infused orange peels effectively remove heavy metals from Waste Water

by Anam Fatima
Published: Updated:
Eco friendly nickel infused orange peels effectively remove heavy metals from wastewater

Scientists have made an exciting discovery that could change how we clean polluted water. In a study published in 2025, researchers found a way to turn ordinary orange peels into a powerful tool for removing dangerous metals from wastewater.

This new method works especially well for toxic metals like lead and cadmium that come from mining and factories. What makes this special is that it uses leftover orange peels that would normally be thrown away, combined with tiny nickel particles, to create an eco-friendly water cleaner.

The technology creates small beads that can pull heavy metals out of water much better than many current methods. These beads work quickly and can be used multiple times.

With many communities around the world struggling with metal-contaminated water, this orange peel solution comes at just the right time. It’s not only effective but also affordable and good for the environment.

How the Orange Peel Cleaner Works

The process begins by collecting orange peels from markets and juice factories. These peels are thoroughly washed, dried, and ground into a fine powder.

What makes orange peels useful is that they contain natural materials like pectin and cellulose that can grab onto metal particles in water. To make them even more effective, scientists add tiny particles of nickel oxide through a special heating process called hydrothermal synthesis.

After adding the nickel, the material is mixed with alginate, a natural substance from seaweed, to form small, round beads about the size of a pinhead. These beads have a rough, porous surface that gives them lots of nooks and crannies where metal particles can get trapped.

Tests show that the nickel makes the orange peel material much better at catching metals – improving its cleaning power by about 300% compared to plain orange peels.

Exceptional Cleaning Performance

When tested in the lab, these orange peel beads showed amazing results. For lead contamination, the beads could remove up to 317 milligrams of lead from each gram of beads used.

For cadmium, they removed up to 224 milligrams per gram. These numbers are about 20-25% better than what commercial water filters can typically achieve.

The cleaning happens quickly too. Within just one hour, the beads remove about 90% of the metals from water, and they reach their full cleaning capacity in about 100 minutes.

They work well in different conditions, functioning properly in water that’s slightly acidic to slightly basic (pH 4-9) and at various temperatures. Even when other harmless minerals like calcium are present in the water, the beads still remove more than 75% of the dangerous metals.

Why This Method Beats Traditional Approaches

Compared to conventional water cleaning methods, this orange peel technology has several advantages. First, it’s much more environmentally friendly.

Instead of using harsh chemicals that can create new pollution problems, it uses natural materials that would otherwise go to waste. One kilogram of orange peels can treat about 500 liters of contaminated water.

Second, it’s more affordable. The materials cost about 60-70% less than the activated carbon used in many commercial filters. The process to make the beads is simple and doesn’t require expensive equipment.

Plus, the beads can be reused several times before needing replacement, keeping costs down.Third, it works better than many existing options.

The beads remove more metal contaminants, work faster, and handle a wider range of water conditions than traditional methods like chemical precipitation or ion exchange systems. They’re especially good for treating the kind of heavily polluted water found near mining operations.

Real-World Testing in Contaminated Areas

The research team didn’t just test their invention in the lab – they tried it in real contaminated water from mining areas in Cameroon. The results were impressive.

In water containing 540 micrograms of lead per liter (far above safe levels), the beads removed over 80% of the lead. For cadmium, they removed about 77% from heavily contaminated samples.

The beads were also tested with water containing multiple pollutants simultaneously, like lead, cadmium and chromium mixed together. Even in these challenging conditions, the beads maintained good performance, removing significant amounts of each metal.

After being used, the beads could be cleaned and reused at least three times while still working effectively.

The Science Behind the Cleaning Action

The secret to how these beads work lies in their structure and chemistry. The surface of the beads carries a slight negative charge, which attracts the positively charged metal particles in the water.

The orange peel material provides special chemical groups called carboxyl and hydroxyl groups that act like tiny magnets for metal atoms.

When metal-contaminated water flows past the beads, several things happen at once. First, the metal particles are drawn to the bead surface by electrical attraction.

Then, they chemically bond to the oxygen atoms in the orange peel material. At the same time, some harmless minerals that were already on the beads get swapped out for the dangerous metals in a process called ion exchange.

Future Improvements and Applications

The researchers are already working on ways to make this technology even better. One approach is adding graphene oxide to the beads to make them stronger and more efficient.

They’re also designing larger-scale systems that could treat continuous flows of wastewater for industrial use.Looking ahead, the team hopes to adapt the technology to remove other dangerous contaminants like arsenic and mercury.

There’s also potential to use different kinds of fruit peels or agricultural waste to make similar cleaning materials. The goal is to create a whole family of natural, low-cost water cleaners that can handle various pollution problems.

A Promising Solution for Clean Water Challenges

This orange peel technology represents an important step forward in water treatment. It offers communities and industries an effective way to deal with metal pollution that’s both affordable and environmentally responsible.

By turning food waste into a water cleaning tool, it demonstrates how we can solve environmental problems with creative, sustainable solutions.

As the technology develops further, it could help provide cleaner water in mining regions, industrial areas, and places where metal contamination threatens public health.

With its combination of high performance, low cost, and eco-friendly materials, this orange peel innovation points toward a cleaner future for water treatment worldwide.

Conclusion

This groundbreaking research demonstrates how agricultural waste can be transformed into an effective solution for water purification. The orange peel-based adsorbent shows remarkable efficiency in removing hazardous heavy metals like lead and cadmium from contaminated water sources.

What makes this technology particularly valuable is its combination of high performance, environmental sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. Unlike conventional treatment methods that often require expensive materials or generate toxic byproducts, this approach utilizes readily available food waste to create a powerful purification system.

The successful field tests in mining areas prove its practical applicability in real-world contamination scenarios. As water pollution continues to threaten ecosystems and public health globally, such innovative and sustainable solutions offer hope for cleaner water access.

Power Terms

1. Nanobiocomposite: A nanobiocomposite is a material made by combining nanoparticles with natural biological substances, like plant fibers or biopolymers. In this study, orange peel (a biological material) was mixed with nickel oxide nanoparticles to create a nanobiocomposite for cleaning polluted water. These materials are important because they are eco-friendly, efficient, and can be used to remove harmful substances like heavy metals from wastewater.

2. Hydrothermal Synthesis: This is a method used to create materials by using high-temperature water in a sealed container. The heat and pressure help mix different substances, like nickel oxide and orange peel, to form a new material. This process is useful because it is simple, cost-effective, and produces high-quality materials with strong adsorption properties.

3. Heavy Metal Removal: Heavy metals, such as lead (Pb²⁺) and cadmium (Cd²⁺), are toxic pollutants found in industrial wastewater. Removing them is crucial because they harm human health and the environment. The nanobiocomposite in this study helps trap these metals so they can be safely removed from water.

4. Adsorption: Adsorption is the process where molecules (like heavy metals) stick to the surface of a material (like the nanobiocomposite). Unlike absorption, where substances are soaked up inside a material, adsorption happens only on the surface. This is important in water treatment because it helps capture pollutants efficiently.

5. Alginate: Alginate is a natural gel-like substance extracted from seaweed. In this study, it was used to form small beads with the nanobiocomposite, making it easier to handle and reuse. Alginate is important because it is biodegradable and helps improve the material’s ability to trap heavy metals.

6. FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy): FTIR is a technique that identifies different chemical groups in a material by measuring how they absorb infrared light. In this study, FTIR confirmed that nickel oxide successfully bonded with orange peel. This helps scientists understand how the material works.

7. XRD (X-ray Diffraction): XRD is a method used to study the crystal structure of materials. By analyzing how X-rays scatter when they hit the material, scientists can determine its composition. In this research, XRD showed that the nanobiocomposite had a well-mixed structure of nickel oxide and orange peel.

8. SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy): SEM produces highly magnified images of a material’s surface, showing tiny details like pores and cracks. This study used SEM to confirm that the nanobiocomposite had a rough, porous surface, which helps trap more heavy metals.

9. EDS (Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy): EDS detects the elements present in a material by measuring the energy of X-rays it emits. Here, EDS proved that nickel was successfully added to the orange peel, confirming the creation of the nanobiocomposite.

10. Langmuir Isotherm: A mathematical model that describes how pollutants spread evenly over a material’s surface in a single layer. This study found that heavy metal adsorption followed the Langmuir model, meaning the nanobiocomposite had a fixed number of binding sites.

11. Freundlich Isotherm: Another model that explains adsorption when pollutants stick unevenly across a material’s surface. Unlike the Langmuir model, Freundlich assumes multiple layers can form. This study compared both models to understand how metals attached to the nanobiocomposite.

12. Pseudo-Second-Order Kinetics: A formula that describes how fast adsorption happens when chemical bonding is involved. The study showed that heavy metal removal followed this model, meaning the process depended on the number of available binding sites.

13. pHPZC (Point of Zero Charge): The pH level where a material’s surface has no net charge. Below this pH, the surface is positive; above it, the surface is negative. The study found the nanobiocomposite’s pHPZC was 5.5, meaning it worked best for metal removal at this pH.

14. Co-Adsorption: When two or more pollutants are removed at the same time. This study tested how well the nanobiocomposite could remove both lead and cadmium together, showing it worked even better than removing them separately.

15. Thermodynamic Study: Examines how temperature affects adsorption. The study found that removing heavy metals was more efficient at higher temperatures, meaning the process was endothermic (absorbed heat).

16. Desorption: The opposite of adsorption—where trapped pollutants are released from the material. The study showed that the nanobiocomposite could be cleaned and reused multiple times by washing it with ethanol.

17. Porosity: The measure of empty spaces (pores) in a material. The nanobiocomposite had high porosity, meaning more surface area for heavy metals to stick to, making it highly effective.

18. Bioaccumulation: The buildup of toxins (like heavy metals) in living organisms over time. This is dangerous because metals like lead and cadmium can poison humans and animals if they enter the food chain.

19. Biocompatibility: How well a material works with biological systems without causing harm. The orange peel-based nanobiocomposite is biocompatible, meaning it’s safe for environmental use.

20. Regeneration: Restoring a material’s ability to adsorb pollutants after use. The study proved the nanobiocomposite could be reused several times, making it cost-effective.

21. ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry): A machine that measures metal concentrations in water. It was used here to check how much lead and cadmium remained after treatment.

22. Kinetic Study: Examines the speed of adsorption. This study found that most heavy metals were trapped within 100 minutes.

23. Dubinin-Radushkevich Isotherm: A model that determines whether adsorption happens via physical or chemical bonding. The study confirmed that physical forces (like van der Waals) were mainly responsible.

24. Agricultural Waste: Unused plant parts, like orange peels, that can be repurposed. Using them in this study made the process eco-friendly and low-cost.

25. Wastewater Remediation: Cleaning polluted water to remove harmful substances. The nanobiocomposite offers a sustainable way to treat industrial wastewater contaminated with heavy metals.

References:

Jacques Romain Njimou, Velma Fai, Mary Tamwa Sieugaing, Djimongbaye Nguenamadje, John Godwin, Oben Bessem Genola, Guy Bertrand Noumi, Bankim Chandra Tripathy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100392.

Text ©. The authors. Except where otherwise noted, content and images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Leave a Comment