Home Crop ManagementBiotic StressDiseases Control Innovative Approaches to Sustainable Almond Waste Management and Pathogen Control

Innovative Approaches to Sustainable Almond Waste Management and Pathogen Control

by Sania Mubeen

Almonds are celebrated worldwide for their nutritional value, but behind their popularity lies a pressing challenge: the almond industry generates 5.03 million metric tons of waste annually, primarily hulls and shells.

While these by-products could be repurposed as livestock feed or compost, pesticide residues from conventional farming practices make them unsafe.

A groundbreaking 2025 study published in the Journal of Natural Pesticide Research proposes a chemical-free strategy using caffeine, silicates, and vitamins to control pests, reduce waste, and promote sustainable almond farming.

The Growing Challenge of Almond Waste

Almond production has surged globally, with 1.51 million metric tons harvested in the 2023/2024 season. California dominates the market, contributing 76% of global output, while Australia has emerged as the second-largest producer.

In 2022–2023, Australian orchards yielded 140,965 tons of kernels, generating $765 million in revenue. However, this success comes with a hidden cost: for every hectare of almond trees, farmers harvest 3.2 tons of edible kernels but discard 6 tons of hulls and shells.

These by-products, particularly the nutrient-rich hulls, hold potential for livestock feed due to their 4–7% crude protein and 25–35% dietary fiber content.

Unfortunately, pesticide residues like chlorpyrifos and permethrin often contaminate hulls, exceeding safety limits set by regulators.

For instance, a 2020 study found 0.2–1.8 ppm of chlorpyrifos in almond hulls—far above the 0.01 ppm threshold allowed for dairy feed.

Such contamination not only risks animal and human health but also forces farmers to dispose of hulls through burning or landfills, contributing to air pollution and soil degradation.

Pesticide Risks in Almond Farming

Almond trees face constant threats from pests and diseases. The Carob moth (Ectomyelois ceratoniae), for example, burrows into almond kernels, causing 30–40% crop losses in untreated orchards.

Similarly, the Carpophilus beetle (Carpophilus spp.) damages almonds by laying eggs inside the fruit, while fungal diseases like Hull Rot (Monilinia fructicola) reduce yields by 15–20%. To combat these issues, farmers rely heavily on chemical pesticides.

In California alone, almond farms account for 34% of the state’s pesticide use, contributing to a 40% annual decline in honeybee populations and contaminating waterways with toxins like imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid linked to aquatic ecosystem damage.

Regulatory pressures further complicate the issue. Australia’s Food Standards Code enforces strict Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) for pesticides in animal feed.

For instance, the MRL for chlorpyrifos—a neurotoxic insecticide—is set at 0.01 ppm, a threshold often breached by almond hulls. These regulations push the industry toward safer, eco-friendly alternatives to avoid fines and market bans.

Limitations of Conventional Pest Control Methods

Integrated Pest Management (IPM), a strategy combining biological and chemical tools, has shown mixed results in almond farming.

For example, releasing parasitic wasps like Goniozus legneri to target Carob moths achieved only 12–15% parasitism rates in field trials.

Similarly, the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, effective in lab settings with 95% larval mortality, drops to 30–40% efficacy in real-world conditions.

Pheromone traps, used to monitor Carpophilus beetles, fail to control outbreaks due to the pest’s ability to hide inside almonds.

The financial and environmental costs of chemical dependency are staggering. Australian almond growers spend AU$300–500 per hectare annually on pesticides, while repeated chemical use degrades soil health, reducing microbial diversity by 40–60%.

This cycle of dependency undermines long-term sustainability, urging the need for innovative solutions.

A Natural Three-Step Defense System for Almond Trees

The 2025 study proposes a systematic, chemical-free approach combining caffeine, silicates, and vitamins to strengthen almond trees’ defenses. Below, we break down how each component works and its proven benefits.

Step 1: Caffeine as a Pest Repellent

Caffeine, a natural compound found in coffee and tea plants, disrupts pests at multiple levels. For example, a 2% caffeine solution applied to soil caused 95% mortality in orchid snails within 48 hours, as shown in a 2003 study.

Similarly, foliar sprays with 1–10 mM caffeine reduced fungal infections like Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (brown blight) by 70% in tea plants.

Caffeine’s effectiveness stems from its ability to inhibit chitinase enzymes, which are critical for fungal cell walls, and block adenosine receptors in insects, paralyzing their nervous systems.

Step 2: Silicates for Stronger Physical Barriers

Silicates, such as potassium silicate, are absorbed by almond trees as silicic acid, fortifying cell walls and creating a physical barrier against pests.

Research on rice plants demonstrated that silicon-treated crops saw 40% fewer infestations of brown planthoppers, while cucumbers treated with 2 mM silicic acid resisted Fusarium wilt by 60%.

Additionally, silicon improves drought resilience—wheat yields increased by 25% under water stress after silicon applications. Farmers can apply potassium silicate via irrigation (150–600 kg/ha) or foliar sprays, with effects visible within 7–10 days.

Step 3: Vitamins to Boost Immunity

Vitamins B, C, and E enhance almond trees’ natural defenses. For instance, 50 ppm of vitamin B1 (thiamine) reduced bacterial blight in rice by 60% by activating defense-related genes.

Vitamin C, a potent antioxidant, protected flax plants from oxidative stress, boosting yields by 30%, while 0.1 mM vitamin E improved drought tolerance in wheat, increasing root biomass by 35%.

When combined, these vitamins create a synergistic effect—pomegranate farmers reported 20% higher fruit yields and 25% more chlorophyll in leaves after mixed vitamin sprays.

Economic and Environmental Benefits

Adopting this three-step strategy offers significant advantages.

First, it enables safe reuse of almond hulls as livestock feed, replacing 30–40% of traditional cattle feed and saving AU$150–350/hectare annually for Australian growers.

Second, reducing pesticide use cuts costs by 50–70%, saving AU$150–350 per hectare.

Environmentally, replacing chemicals with natural solutions lowers greenhouse gas emissions by 1.2 tons of CO2 per hectare yearly and enhances soil health, increasing microbial activity by 20–30%.

Challenges and the Path Forward

Transitioning to this model requires upfront investments of AU$10,000–15,000 per hectare for caffeine extraction and silicate processing.

Farmers also need training to avoid overdosing—for example, caffeine concentrations above 10 mM can stunt plant growth. Ongoing research aims to optimize vitamin formulations and scale production of cost-effective silicon blends.

Partnerships with companies like Dual Chelate Fertilizer Pty Ltd are critical to making these solutions accessible.

Conclusion: Building a Sustainable Future for Almond Farming

The almond industry stands at a crossroads. By embracing natural solutions like caffeine, silicates, and vitamins, farmers can eliminate pesticide residues, reduce waste, and improve crop resilience.

As Australia aims to double almond production by 2030, this strategy offers a blueprint for balancing productivity with planetary health.

In the words of lead researcher Dr. Manjula Udagepolage Don, “Our approach isn’t just about replacing chemicals—it’s about rethinking how we work with nature to build resilient food systems.”

reference:

Udagepolage Don, M. N., Florentine, S., Turville, C., & Dassanayake, K. (2025). Strategies for enhancing sustainable and economic utilization of almond waste through a comprehensive multi-stage systematic approach to pathogen control. Journal of Natural Pesticide Research, 12, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.napere.2025.100126

Text ©. The authors. Except where otherwise noted, content and images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Leave a Comment